<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: TLC Test Kit Refill	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://protestkit.eu/tlc-test-kit-refill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://protestkit.eu/tlc-test-kit-refill/</link>
	<description>Drug test kits – Drug purity testing kits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Zozo		</title>
		<link>https://protestkit.eu/tlc-test-kit-refill/comment-page-1/#comment-168888</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zozo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 07:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protestkit.eu/?post_type=product&#038;p=1255#comment-168888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Love it
Very useful
Important alternative for indication of potency

When you say pairing with reagents, do you mean having reagent on the card result area diameter, or just a reagent test in general for that particular substance?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it<br />
Very useful<br />
Important alternative for indication of potency</p>
<p>When you say pairing with reagents, do you mean having reagent on the card result area diameter, or just a reagent test in general for that particular substance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerzy Afanasjew		</title>
		<link>https://protestkit.eu/tlc-test-kit-refill/comment-page-1/#comment-75916</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerzy Afanasjew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 06:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protestkit.eu/?post_type=product&#038;p=1255#comment-75916</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://protestkit.eu/tlc-test-kit-refill/comment-page-1/#comment-75889&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for your feedback. To avoid false positives make sure to pair TLC with reagent tests. Regards, Jurek @ PRO Test]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://protestkit.eu/tlc-test-kit-refill/comment-page-1/#comment-75889">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for your feedback. To avoid false positives make sure to pair TLC with reagent tests. Regards, Jurek @ PRO Test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://protestkit.eu/tlc-test-kit-refill/comment-page-1/#comment-75889</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.protestkit.eu/?post_type=product&#038;p=1255#comment-75889</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I used the TLC test so much that I quickly needed a refill.
The test results are a bit difficult to understand at times. Certain substances can apparently give false positives (I was told that through Reddit support).
At the same time, for inexperienced users like myself, the results are hard to interpret when they don’t match expectations.
I would appreciate more detailed explanation (especially about possible variations) and a backwards search in the substance table/calculator a lot (backwards meaning being able to type in the value and receiving all possible or likely substances)!
Nevertheless was I able to verify the purity of several substances with the test and get an idea for possibly used adulterants (e.g. likely caffein, procaine etc.) in others.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the TLC test so much that I quickly needed a refill.<br />
The test results are a bit difficult to understand at times. Certain substances can apparently give false positives (I was told that through Reddit support).<br />
At the same time, for inexperienced users like myself, the results are hard to interpret when they don’t match expectations.<br />
I would appreciate more detailed explanation (especially about possible variations) and a backwards search in the substance table/calculator a lot (backwards meaning being able to type in the value and receiving all possible or likely substances)!<br />
Nevertheless was I able to verify the purity of several substances with the test and get an idea for possibly used adulterants (e.g. likely caffein, procaine etc.) in others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Redis

Served from: protestkit.eu @ 2026-07-01 00:16:39 by W3 Total Cache
-->